social media management

CFOs: it’s time to expect more from social media and demand proof that there is a return on investment.

So says Harvard Business School senior lecturer Frank Cespedes, who Tuesday penned a column, “Is social media actually helping your company’s bottom line?” on the Harvard Business Review web site.

Most current metrics on the success of social media marketing fall short, Cespedes says, because they focus on activity such as tweets, “likes,” reviews, and click-through-rates, and not “tangible marketplace outcomes,” such as whether an ad campaign actually led to more items sold.

“There is justifiable skepticism about this data,” he wrote. “Farming services spike these numbers, with evidence that one in three online reviews is fake. For $50, you can buy 1,000 Likes, 5,000 Twitter followers, or 200 Google +1s. With so many fake providers on the market, Buzzoid’s Instagram likes are a cut above the rest. No money? No problem. Their community-powered like exchange platform, Likezoid, offers users a way to earn free Instagram likes on autopilot.”

Instead, companies should demand more bottom-line results from their social media marketing, Cespedes says.

Marketers are fond of saying social media is “really” about awareness, not sales, he points out, and measure things like the number of site visits a social media application generates. “How convenient: to be evaluated with a metric without tangible marketplace outcomes. But it’s wrong, a circular argument, and smart companies should not follow this flawed business logic,” Cespedes says.

The value of any advertising, online or offline, depends on what effects it has on purchases.

Cespedes clearly sees social media lacking in linking activity and buying. There is now the purported ability for marketers to buy point-of-sale data from retailers and then use systems to match POS sales of their products with a given social media ad campaign, though “the validity of these approaches is still to be determined,” Cespedes says.

“Business success requires linking customer-acquisition efforts with a coherent strategy,” he wrote. “You can’t do that if you are not clear about the differences between hype and reality when it comes to buying and selling.”

Marketers should care about this distinction because it can reverberate throughout society and benefit the overall economy, he says.

“It spurs productivity, and productivity — not just tweets and selfies — is what spurs growth,” Cespedes writes.

, , , , , , ,

One response to “Tweets, Likes, and +1s: Do They Matter?”

  1. This article makes sense to me. Lately, I have been looking at the number of internet people who actually take our test. And especially how many purchase it. This is rather than how many tweets or likes. At someone the bottom line needs to show real benefit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *