Does your culture matter to your financial and operational performance, and if so, what’s the relationship?
Leaders consider organizational culture a primary catalyst for effectiveness and growth. Consider the following excerpt from “Organizational Climate and Culture”:
“Culture is often the explanation for poor performance, whether expressed in poor financials or in specific events embarrassing to the firm. Such events are detailed daily in the popular press: Profit shortfalls at J.C. Penney are explained as a cultural issue (‘It is all because of the legacy of Mr. Penney’s ways’), legal difficulties regarding women at WalMart are described as a result of the culture (‘Wal-Mart is a male-dominated culture’), and ethical lapses at any number of firms that hit the pages of The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times are explained as a consequence of culture (‘The winner-take-all culture is what led to these lapses’).”
I recently worked with a group of human resources officers who interviewed current and former CEOs and board members from Fortune 1000 companies, who described a vital future organizational role that could be called “Chief Operating Officer of Culture.”
Is there evidence that culture relates to organizational performance? One study examined this question by reviewing previous research published between 1980 and 2008. The findings suggest that there is a connection between culture and effectiveness, but also that leaders should learn to think about culture more like a blend than a single variety.
There are many ways to measure culture, and past studies most frequently measured culture along dimensions that correspond to the Competing Values Framework, which defines the following culture types:
The theory behind this framework is that each of these cultures is appropriate to achieve certain corresponding objectives. Clan cultures produce high employee satisfaction and commitment; adhocracy cultures produce innovation; market cultures produce market share, profit, quality, and productivity; and hierarchy cultures produce efficiency, timeliness, and smooth functioning.
Organizational leaders often reflect this idea when they aim for a culture driving specific outcomes, such as one of innovation, of high performance, of customer focus, etc.
The researchers studied how organizational outcomes related to clan, adhocracy, and market cultures (but not hierarchy cultures, because their investigation didn’t reveal enough studies that measured them). It turns out that the reality of culture and organizational effectiveness is a lot more complex and interesting than simply one culture leading to one outcome. In fact, multiple culture types often co-exist.
According to the research, some culture types are indeed more highly related to some organizational outcomes, but typically each culture type is related to more than one outcome, and outcomes are related to more than one culture type. All three studied culture types are positively related to employee job satisfaction, innovation, and product-service quality. The clan culture is most strongly related to employee attitudes and the market culture to innovation and financial effectiveness, but all three cultures show positive relationships with all of these outcomes.
Does culture matter to the bottom line? When predicting objective measures of profit and growth, both the adhocracy and market cultures show positive and similar relationships, while the clan culture is less strongly related.
The best approach to culture may not be to pursue one best culture to reach a particular organizational outcome, but instead to nurture multiple culture types at the same time, so that they act in synergy to support the organization’s goals. The study authors suggest, for example, that clan cultures’ emphasis on collaboration, trust, communication, and support may provide the internal integration needed to strengthen market cultures’ capacity to innovatively meet customers’ needs.
What does this mean for your leadership and investment in organizational culture? It requires thinking “outside the lines.” Culture does not pay off simply in a linear relationship where more of one thing creates more of another. Rather, the key lies in the configuration of culture types, and fitting that configuration to your unique goals and strategy. It’s complex, but the good news is that research is emerging to guide you.
The complexity also has an upside, because if you get it right it’s a lot harder for your competitors to duplicate.
John Boudreau is professor and research director at the University of Southern California’s Marshall School of Business and Center for Effective Organizations, and author of the forthcoming books “Lead the Work” with Ravin Jesuthasan and David Creelman and “Global Trends in Human Resource Management” with Edward E. Lawler III.