CFO Blog: Commentary and Opinion

You are here: Home : CFO Blog : Knee-jerk Populism Part II

Knee-jerk Populism Part II
Posted by Tim Reason | | Europe
November 12, 2008 2:00 PM ET

After writing a blog post at work yesterday about the AIG junket that wasn't , I was fascinated, and horrified, to go home and watch all the actual TV coverage.

This total non-story made it onto just about every news outlet you can imagine, including segments throughout the day on CNN. The height of ridiculousness was that AIG CEO Ed Liddy was forced to go on Larry King Live — as the first guest — to defend this ordinary conference against charges of being an executive boondoggle. (CNN realized midway through the day what a joke this story was and began inserting some balance into its reports, but couldn't stop pumping it in advance of the Larry King show.)

The absolute nadir was the original, breathlessly reported exclusive undercover investigative report by the Phoenix ABC affiliate. If you thought it was impossible to make something as excruciatingly boring as a 3-day insurance conference sound like an orgy at the Playboy Mansion, well, just click the video.

(Way to go, ABC15 reporter Josh Bernstein. Stay tuned for his story six months from now on why the bottom suddenly fell out of the Phoenix conference business.)

Or simply click on the slideshow to see the AIG executives "sitting poolside, drinking coffee, while other people attending the conference were in meetings." Coffee? Good grief! What a debauched bunch these insurance executives are. And how odd that they don't attend training sessions describing products that they designed!

Despite the fact that these guys were meeting in suits and ties at a table, surrounded by briefcases overflowing with work folders, other media outlets quickly began reporting that they were "lounging by the pool." Speaking from personal experience, having a meeting in the pool area of a conference hotel with your work colleagues in a dark business suit and tie in the hot sun is closer to a waterboarding than a boondoggle on the spectrum of creature comforts. The only reason anyone does this at all is that they're desperate for fresh air after days of inside meetings.

As AIG has admitted, it has behaved abominably in the past. Issuing billions in credit default swaps? That's terrible risk management. AIG executives hunting quail in the English countryside? That's a boondoggle. Putting on conference for financial planners that sell your product? That's good marketing.

The inability of the media, the government, and the public to distinguish between corporate excess and ordinary business is the result of the very same financial illiteracy that got us into this mess in the first place.

Most media outlets took great glee in reporting that this supposed "executive day spa" took place at the same time AIG's original bailout was revised. But most failed to note why it was revised: the terms were so onerous that they put AIG at risk of failing anyway. That's hardly good for taxpayers.

And pouncing on this company every time it attempts to conduct normal business anywhere other than an IHOP (as one CNN anchor suggested) is also a great way to make sure the bailout fails and we taxpayers never see that money again.

Comments (3)

Comments | Post a Comment
I agree completely with you. If this had been a conference for just the C-level at AIG, then it would have been something to report. Businesses at every level, receiving taxpayer dollars or not, do something nice for their customers/distributors (or in other words, the people who make them money) in order to educate them about and entice them to buy/sell their products. As a taxpayer, I want AIG to be successful in selling insurance, so that I and the rest of my fellow tax payers get paid back.

If this conference had occurred in a non-sweeps month, I bet the report never would have aired.
Posted by Kevin Otoole | November 12, 2008 03:08pm

I concur with your very salient points concerning this AIG business. Moreover I am also worried about the $700(+)B bailout plan and the restrictions and other issues that are going to arise for the companies that end up requesting aid/help. One of the problems with the Federal government's being involved is that most of them are attorneys and not business people and moreover many are or have become career politicians and have no clue about what it takes to achieve and succeed in the 'real' world.
Posted by Matthew Birmingham | November 12, 2008 03:49pm

Wow! Finally the voice of reason over this ridiculous non-story. Brian Ross finished his report by saying of AIG, "They're going to conduct business as if nothing happened." Working at AIG, I can tell you that this is truly the ultimate height of journalistic arrogance.
Posted by Robert Fleishman | November 12, 2008 08:55pm

previous post next post
How I Fell Into the Uncanny Valley of Digital Marketing
Gold Medal Whining
Happy Birthday, iPhone; Bye, Bye BlackBerry
Happy Birthday, iPhone; Bye, Bye BlackBerry
This Is An Angry, But Positive Blog
« JUNE 2017 »
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  
Email to a Colleague
  Printer Friendly Version  
  RSS Feeds  
CFO Daily Briefing
CFO Weekly Briefing
Risk & Compliance
Notify me of future events
Enter your email address to begin receiving updates on these topics.
Could Bank Rules End Fair Value Debate?
EU Ups the Ante on Rating Agency Reform
GAO to IRS: Get Control of Yourself
BearingPoint: Nine Years, Ten CFOs
Grim Outlook: Defaults Will Be Soaring
Regulators to Banks: Start Lending Now!
KPMG International Picks Insider as CFO
Blue Coat, Ex-CFO Settle over Backdating
A Deal Not Even Mariano Rivera Can Close
Browse all Today in Finance