CFO
Menu
  • Accounting & Tax
  • Banking & Capital Markets
  • Growth Companies
  • Human Capital & Careers
  • Risk & Compliance
  • Strategy
  • Technology
  • Sign InSign Up
CFO
  • Conferences
  • Webcasts
  • Research
  • White Papers
  • Jobs
  • Training
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
CFO
Technology to Alter Finance’s Business Partner Role
Intelligent automation and advanced analytics mean…
Metric of the Month: Establishing the Daily Cash Position
Establishing a daily cash position can be a…
Female Pay Discount Doesn’t Go to the Very Top
At large companies, male CFOs tend to earn more…
  • Accounting & Tax
  • Banking & Capital Markets
  • Risk & Compliance
  • Human Capital & Careers
  • Growth Companies
  • Strategy
  • Technology
Regulation

SEC Accuses Four Firms of ICFR Deficiencies

The companies allegedly failed to remedy material weaknesses in their internal controls over financial reporting for seven to 10 consecutive years.

Matthew Heller
January 30, 2019 | CFO.com | US - Comments: 2
share
Tweet
Print

Email this article

Four public companies have been fined a total of $435,000 for failing to remedy material weaknesses in their internal controls over financial reporting for seven to 10 consecutive annual reporting periods.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission said two of the companies — Mexican steel producer Grupo Simec and kefir smoothie maker Lifeway Foods — failed to complete the required evaluation of the effectiveness of their ICFR systems for two consecutive annual reporting periods and that Grupo Simec is still in the process of remediating its material weaknesses.

Recommended Stories:
  • Cognizant Settles Foreign Bribery Charges
  • SAI Global Adds RegTech Muscle With BWise Buy
  • Lawmakers Seek Answers Over Apple Bug

Software maker Digital Turbine and biotech firm Cytodyn were also cited by the SEC for ICFR deficiencies. All four companies agreed to settlements, with Grupo Simec paying the largest fine of $200,000.

“Adequate internal controls are the first line of defense in detecting and preventing material errors or fraud in financial reporting,” SEC Chief Accountant Wesley Bricker said in a news release. “When internal control deficiencies are left unaddressed, financial reporting quality can suffer.”

According to the SEC, Grupo Simec disclosed material weaknesses in each of its Form 10-K annual reports from 2008 through 2017, with the lack of an “appropriate consolidation system to allow management to properly supervise the preparation of consolidated financial information” being a persistent problem.

In certain years, the company also acknowledged having a “very vulnerable procedure to determine costs due to manual calculations.”

Grupo Simec’s “persistent and extensive material weaknesses indicate that management did not appropriately address, and in some periods adequately assess, its admitted ICFR material weaknesses and associated risks,” the SEC alleged.

The commission also said Grupo Simec’s CEO and CFO failed to complete their annual ICFR evaluation in 2015 and 2016 and that while the company has completed the design and testing of its internal controls, “there continues to be material weaknesses that it is still in the process of remediating.”

In Lifeway’s case, the SEC noted that its “failure to address its material weaknesses has been compounded by three announced restatements since fiscal 2012.”

“Disclosure of material weaknesses is not enough without meaningful remediation,” said Melissa Hodgman, an associate director in the SEC’s Enforcement Division.

Post navigation

← Lockheed Sells Pension Risk
Fed Shifts to ‘Patient’ Policy on Rate Hikes →

2 responses “SEC Accuses Four Firms of ICFR Deficiencies”

  1. bob hirth said 01/30/19 15:37pm

    If you look at the audit firms involved here, it is perhaps telling…

    Reply
    • Lou said 01/30/19 16:29pm

      The audit discloses such weaknesses, and would perform certain additional procedures to ensure the financial reporting is appropriate. Of course, I am sure these companies paid lots of extra money for the audits. It is also possible that they have changed auditors over the periods. At some point, an auditor should evaluate a realtionship with a client though.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement

Popular Articles

  1. Mismatch: Finance Roles’ Importance vs. Performance
  2. SEC Accuses Four Firms of ICFR Deficiencies
  3. Tesla CFO Ahuja’s Retirement Stuns Wall St
  4. DHS Announces Changes To H-1B System
  5. ASC 606: Trips, Traps, and Troubleshooting
Advertisement
 

Topics

  • Accounting & Tax
  • Banking & Capital Markets
  • Human Capital & Careers
  • Growth Companies
  • Risk & Compliance
  • Strategy
  • Technology

Media

  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • Research
  • Magazine

Events

  • Conferences
  • Argyle Events
  • Webcasts

Services

  • Reprints
  • Back Issues
  • Mobile
  • Widgets
  • RSS

About CFO

  • About CFO
  • Editorial Staff
  • Press
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Want the Magazine?

Relax and unplug with our award-winning coverage.

Subscribe Now
Follow Us