CFO
Menu
  • Accounting & Tax
  • Banking & Capital Markets
  • Growth Companies
  • Human Capital & Careers
  • Risk & Compliance
  • Strategy
  • Technology
  • Sign InSign Up
CFO
  • Conferences
  • Webcasts
  • Research
  • White Papers
  • Jobs
  • Training
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
CFO
Technology to Alter Finance’s Business Partner Role
Intelligent automation and advanced analytics mean…
Metric of the Month: Establishing the Daily Cash Position
Establishing a daily cash position can be a…
Female Pay Discount Doesn’t Go to the Very Top
At large companies, male CFOs tend to earn more…
  • Accounting & Tax
  • Banking & Capital Markets
  • Risk & Compliance
  • Human Capital & Careers
  • Growth Companies
  • Strategy
  • Technology
Human Capital & Careers

Curing Spring Fever

Businesses appear to see the wisdom in more-flexible approaches to time off.

Laura DeMars
February 20, 2007 | CFO Magazine
share
Tweet
Print

Email this article

As flu season approaches its peak, employers beware: sick days may affect the bottom line more than usual. A survey by CCH found that in 2006 unscheduled absenteeism among employees reached its highest rate since 1999. Large companies are paying up to $850,000 a year in payroll for sick time, not to mention the cost of temporary replacements and lost productivity. That’s doubly painful when you consider that only about one out of three of those “sick” days are for actual illness, while 65 percent are the result of family issues, personal needs, stress, and the so-called mental-health day, according to Pamela Wolf, a workplace analyst at CCH.

But companies that crack down by enforcing stringent sick-time policies (or offer none at all) risk “presenteeism”: sick employees show up but do little work and infect their co-workers.

Recommended Stories:
  • Extras! Extras!
  • Clocking R&R
  • Banking Time

Barry Blass, CFO of Hachenberger Management, a holding company that owns and manages more than 40 businesses ranging from realty to horticulture, recommends a middle ground: his company instituted a paid-time-off bank five years ago that gives employees at least 10 days a year for illness or personal needs. He says the policy did not cause absenteeism to increase. “Our workers understand that if they abuse the system, they’ll pay out of pocket for each day they take over the limit,” he says.

Increasingly, businesses appear to see the wisdom in more-flexible approaches to time off. The average number of work-life programs a company offers, such as leave for school functions and telecommuting, has increased from 9 to 11, and more companies are providing elder and on-site child-care services. It’s not all a matter of accommodation, however: the survey also found that an overwhelming 97 percent of companies use disciplinary action to enforce time-off policies and rank such action as the most frequently used means of preventing abuse.

Post navigation

← DoJ Won’t Refloat “Enron Barge” Case
Reform Effort Rebuked →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisement

Popular Articles

  1. Mismatch: Finance Roles’ Importance vs. Performance
  2. SEC Accuses Four Firms of ICFR Deficiencies
  3. Tesla CFO Ahuja’s Retirement Stuns Wall St
  4. DHS Announces Changes To H-1B System
  5. ASC 606: Trips, Traps, and Troubleshooting
Advertisement
 

Topics

  • Accounting & Tax
  • Banking & Capital Markets
  • Human Capital & Careers
  • Growth Companies
  • Risk & Compliance
  • Strategy
  • Technology

Media

  • Videos
  • Whitepapers
  • Research
  • Magazine

Events

  • Conferences
  • Argyle Events
  • Webcasts

Services

  • Reprints
  • Back Issues
  • Mobile
  • Widgets
  • RSS

About CFO

  • About CFO
  • Editorial Staff
  • Press
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Want the Magazine?

Relax and unplug with our award-winning coverage.

Subscribe Now
Follow Us