CFO Blog: Commentary and Opinion

You are here: Home : CFO Blog : Good News, Bad News, Hank

CAPITAL MARKETS
Good News, Bad News, Hank
Posted by Tim Reason | CFO.com | US
May 17, 2007 4:36 PM ET

At the risk of stepping in front of the speeding train that is Hank Paulson's regulatory rollback effort, may I point out that the whole argument for the Capital Market Plan he launched this morning was looking kind of shaky by this afternoon?

As we reported earlier today, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association just announced that the apparently sickly U.S. capital markets saw a 13 percent increase in issuance of new securities the first quarter..

Total equity underwriting jumped 42.6 percent year-on-year, to $61.4 billion, on 202 deals. That's a slight decline in value from the previous quarter, but the first time $60 billion of equity was raised in consecutive quarters in nearly seven years, according to SIFMA.

Meanwhile, PricewaterhouseCoopers reports that US IPO activity during the traditionally quiet first quarter hit a seven-year high in terms of both volume and proceeds, with $12.1 billion raised through 64 IPOs, up from $11.6 billion from 54 IPOs in Q1 2006.

Yes, deal size is down slightly —, averaging $190 million instead of $216 million — but given all the comparisons floated around the press that speciously suggest London's AIM is somehow stealing business from the NYSE and Nasdaq, that shows that smaller IPOs are actually also doing fine in the U.S.

Indeed, says PwC, although London remains Europe's premier IPO market with 43 percent of IPO volume and 81 percent of value, these numbers represent a sharp drop in volume and a slight decline in value compared with Q1 2006.

Oh, and by the way, here's why: "London's decline is attributable to less activity on the AIM."

Oh dear. Seems London's global competitiveness must be suffering from too many principles.

Comments (3)


Comments | Post a Comment
It warrants mentioning that, for the first time, private placements raised more money than IPOs last year, "demonstrating how issuers are increasingly shying away from the scrutiny and expense of the US public market."
Posted by Jason Karaian | May 18, 2007 05:20am

I'm not convinced by your argument. I don't think the cost of public issuance is the sole cause, or even the major cause, of the rise in private placement. I think people are too quick to jump to conclusions.
Posted by Hassen Al-Shawaf | May 18, 2007 01:26pm

Let's remember a little history. Private ownership, then partnership, came first. The only reasons corporations came to be was to raise more capital than a few individuals can spare, and to limit liability.

If you don't need more money than you can raise privately, why go to the trouble and expense of going public anywhere?
Posted by Paul Meisel | May 22, 2007 08:59am

previous post next post
MOST RECENT POSTS
Yikes!
If Only All Loan Apps Were This Easy
Lesson of the Crisis: Good Economics and Bad Politics Don't Mix
Year of the Anti-Tiger
IFRS: Another Cost Guessing Game
ABOUT THE CFO BLOG
FAQ
ARCHIVES
« DECEMBER 2008 »
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31    
   
OPTIONS
Email to a Colleague
  Printer Friendly Version  
Get Blog Alerts
  RSS Feeds  
WE DELIVER
Newsletters
Capital Markets/Banking
Today in Finance
Webcasts
Notify me of future events
Email Alerts
Cash Management
Finance
Enter your email address to begin receiving updates on these topics.
INSIDE TODAY IN FINANCE
Audit-Firm Study to Start This Fall
Sun Announces $3 Billion Buyback
Barney Frank Eyes Private-Equity Pay Cut
Restatements Draw Treasury's Ire
Capital Market Issuance Up 13 Percent
PwC: Internal Auditors May Miss Risks
FASB: A Segue to More Segmenting
PCAOB Votes on Internal Controls May 24
Browse all Today in Finance

advertisement