CFO Blog: Commentary and Opinion

You are here: Home : CFO Blog : Banks Don't Like Accounting. Too Bad.

BANKING
Banks Don't Like Accounting. Too Bad.
Posted by Tim Reason | CFO.com | US
May 13, 2008 10:25 AM ET

Kudos to David Reilly, the Wall Street Journal's accounting reporter par excellence for noting in today's "Heard on the Street" column that GAAP's increasing emphasis on fair value was resulting in a return to that classic pro forma standby, EBBS, or "Earnings Before Bad Stuff."

As we reported yesterday, MBIA roundly blamed its first-quarter earnings results on fair value, and Reilly cites this gem of a quote from MBIA chief financial officer Edward Chaplin: "[Fair value is] disorting the book value of the company as opposed to providing additional useful information to investors."

Fair value is the hot topic these days, and you can be sure you'll be seeing more from us on this. But the fair value controversy is just the latest contretemps stemming from another issue that's rarely addressed directly, and that is that banks and financial services firms simply don't like accounting rules.

Accounting rules are largely written for companies that make money by selling services or widgets. But banks and financial services firms make money by selling money itself — not to mention advising clients on creative ways to bend (or "leverage") accounting rules to their advantage.

Frankly, I think accounting standards setters worry too much about accommodating banks. I've sat in on FASB meetings in the past that have foundered on the topic of what a particular rule would mean for banks or various funky financial instruments — a classic case of the tail wagging the dog. I've also noted before that banking regulators often give banks a pass on GAAP compliance.

Accounting would probably be far simpler for most companies if banks were just forced to follow more generic rules. These days, there's plenty of evidence that investors would be better off as well.

A partial solution to this may come from the SEC's Advisory Committee on Improvements to Financial Reporting, which has proposed eliminating industry-specific guidance. Of course, that's more likely to simplify items like revenue recognition for software companies than send a message to financial services firms to suck it up. But it's a start.

Post a Comment


previous post next post
MOST RECENT POSTS
Yikes!
If Only All Loan Apps Were This Easy
Lesson of the Crisis: Good Economics and Bad Politics Don't Mix
Year of the Anti-Tiger
IFRS: Another Cost Guessing Game
ABOUT THE CFO BLOG
FAQ
ARCHIVES
« DECEMBER 2008 »
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31    
   
OPTIONS
Email to a Colleague
  Printer Friendly Version  
Get Blog Alerts
  RSS Feeds  
WE DELIVER
Newsletters
Capital Markets/Banking
Today in Finance
Webcasts
Notify me of future events
Email Alerts
Banking
Capital Markets
Enter your email address to begin receiving updates on these topics.
INSIDE TODAY IN FINANCE
It's Alive: Data-tagging Plan Expected
S&P on Junk: The Future Is Now
Which Rules Rule? Now Ask FASB
Fed: "Markets Are Still Far from Normal"
Deals: Sprinting into the Future?
Fair Value: Nothing New under the Sun?
Private Equity Paints "Help Wanted" Sign
Browse all Today in Finance

advertisement