Free Subscription to CFO Magazine

CFO Blog: Commentary and Opinion

You are here: Home : CFO Blog : You're Probably Not Reading This

COMPENSATION
You're Probably Not Reading This
Posted by Tim Reason | CFO.com | US
December 26, 2007 11:00 AM ET

Last Friday, right before Christmas, at 1:22 pm (according to my e-mail server), the Securities and Exchange Commission released a new XBRL-based tool that allows users to compare executive compensation packages at the 500 largest U.S. companies.

In the process, it also proved that irony is not the regulator's strong suit.

As you may recall — but, for reasons to follow, probably do not — exactly a year earlier, at 5:15 pm on the Friday before Christmas, the SEC released its now-infamous "Christmas Surprise", a seemingly last-minute change to its new compensation disclosure rules that critics said was timed to receive the least possible amount of media and public attention.

The SEC denied trying to conceal the change; an assertion bolstered in part by the somewhat-delayed firestorm it created instead. Critics charged that the SEC had switched around the disclosure in a way that would seem to reduce the annual amount of compensation reported. Then-incoming chairman of the House Financial Services Committee Barney Frank told CFO.com that the SEC and its Republican chairman had failed to grasp "how greatly they have pissed off America over stock options."

The SEC retorted that the new disclosure actually contained more information, and was now consistent with accounting rules to boot.

Both sides had their points, as we reported at the time. The main beef was whether stock option grants should be recorded in their entirety at fair value the year they are granted (creating a whopping number for lucky execs) or the SEC's new method, which, like GAAP, essentially smoothed that number by spreading the value over the vesting period. The new tool may make some critics happy, as it allows users to calculate the fair value of options granted in the given year. But it seems a somewhat anemic demonstration of XBRL, since it presumably could also include options exercised (pulling from other SEC filings) and, more important, a running tally of the value of unvested or unexercised options from prior years, which would give a much fuller picture of executive compensation.

Comments (1)


Comments | Post a Comment
Interesting post, but you touch on an even bigger SEC trajectory towards manadatory XBRL filings. This will lead to greater flexibility for companies in reporting, and presumably bring more detail in reporting. For instance, companies will be able to break out sales revenue by product line should they wish. WOuld be interested in seeing more on XBRL's impact on SEC and financial reporting in general.

Here's a release on the SEC's XBRL VFP:
http://www.ubmatrix.com/news/pr_120407.htm

I'd also recommend some case studies on uses of XBRL for financial info reporting and exchange outside of SEC filing as well:
http://www.ubmatrix.com/casestudies/
Posted by Daniel Cahill | February 19, 2008 05:21pm

previous post next post
MOST RECENT POSTS
How Smart Is Business Intelligence?
Confessions of a Facebook Drop-Out
What Does Internal Audit Expect from the CFO?
The Real Moneyball
Expense-Report Approvals: No Laughing Matter
ABOUT THE CFO BLOG
FAQ
ARCHIVES
« FEBRUARY 2012 »
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29    
   
OPTIONS
Email to a Colleague
  Printer Friendly Version  
  RSS Feeds  
WE DELIVER
Newsletters
CFO Daily Briefing
Human Capital, Careers, and Benefits
Webcasts
Notify me of future events
Enter your email address to begin receiving updates on these topics.
INSIDE TODAY IN FINANCE
Accelerated Share Repurchase: Pros, Cons
Alcatel-Lucent Settles Its "Travel-Gate"
The Tweed Jacket Brigade
Diebold's "Bill and Hold" Probe Widens
Loyalty Programs Prepare for Takeoff
Back in the Game
Ex-CFO Bagged for Fraud
Mastering the Flow
Breaking Up Is Expensive to Do
Browse all Today in Finance

advertisement