|
"Cooperation" has been much in the news recently, as I blogged about here. That post regarded Judge Lewis Kaplan's recent rebuke of Federal prosecutors for pushing KPMG to cut off legal support to former employees embroiled in a tax shelter case. In the interests of "cooperating," KPMG complied, a move that Kaplan said constituted a violation of the ex-employees' Constitutional rights
That got lots of headlines. I just came across yet another blow
to the government's efforts to encourage cooperation, this one by the Tenth Circuit Federal Court of Appeals. About a month ago (this slipped under my radar), the court denied Qwest Communications its request for a "selective waiver."
What's a selective waiver? Under the various enforcement agency cooperation doctrines (the DoJ's is the "Thomson memo," the SEC's is the "Seaboard" doctrine), companies get credit for waiving their attorney-client privilege and providing the government with the results of their internal investigations (which are usually conducted by outside attorneys). The problem: Waiving that privilege means plaintiff's lawyers can get their hands on the stuff too. A "selective waiver," which doesn't seem to actually exist in legal-land, would allow companies to provide the documents to government agencies, but not to plaintiff's attorneys. I wrote an article about this Catch-22 situation about a year ago, noting that the SEC was lobbying hard to get "selective waivers" approved.
More recently, some observers thought new SEC chairman Christopher Cox, a former Congressman, would help push this through Congress, but so far, no dice.
|