You are here: Home : CFO Magazine : May 2007 Issue : Article
The Replacements
With staff defections on the rise, CFOs are paying more attention to new hires.
Laura DeMars
CFO Magazine
May 1, 2007
If ever a move was guaranteed to fan the flames of worker cynicism, this was it. In March, embattled retailer Circuit City announced it was laying off about 3,400 employees. The company's management went on to note that it planned to immediately refill most of the vacancies — at reduced salaries.
No wonder employee loyalty is at an all-time low. Decades of downsizing, offshoring, and outsourcing have plumped up corporate coffers, but the moves have also sapped most of the allegiance employees once felt for their bosses. At the same time, reduced health-care benefits — along with the rise of more-portable pension plans — have left workers with fewer ties binding them to employers.
advertisementThe result? Many employees now see themselves as free agents. This is especially true of younger workers, many of whom routinely scour the Internet looking for better gigs. They seem to be doing so with remarkable proficiency: the Department of Labor reports that, between the ages of 18 and 35, the average American employee now holds 10 different jobs.
This flitting about is no longer restricted to sales personnel and techies, either. Buoyed by an acute manpower shortage, finance professionals are now changing jobs at a regular clip. This sudden demand may be great news for CPAs, but it's lousy for those who employ them. Indeed, The Hackett Group reckons that, at the average U.S. business, nearly 1 in 10 finance staffers leave their jobs each year.
Not surprisingly, CFOs say they spend a great deal of their time lining up replacements for the departed. But as many finance chiefs have discovered, finding qualified candidates is only half of the equation. CFOs must also bring new hires up to speed in a seamless fashion. "Finance chiefs today are plagued by high turnover," says Jim Bloem, CFO at health insurer Humana. "So you have to do everything you can to make sure you acclimate your new hires appropriately."
Churn, Baby, Churn
That acclimation, referred to as onboarding, usually requires a small dose of training and a fair amount of hand-holding. Ideally, managers should bring new workers onboard without imposing any demands on existing workers. At the same time, they don't want to just parachute new hires into a strange office and let them fend for themselves.
Joyce Bastoli, senior vice president at staffing specialist Ajilon Finance, advises employers to put parameters in place to make the transition as easy as possible. For example, she says it's wise to document each position in terms of processes, responsibilities, even how to use specific software. That way, a recent recruit understands what the job entails even before the boss gets around to introducing him or her to the rest of the staff.
That sort of assistance, while useful, can be pricey. Then again, bringing in a new employee is usually an expensive proposition. Nancy R. Mobley, CEO of Insight Performance, a human-resources consulting firm, estimates that it costs an employer one-and-a-half to two times a former worker's annual salary to recruit, interview, and train a replacement.
To reduce that outlay, some businesses are looking to shorten the onboarding process. Mark Heimbouch, CFO of tax-preparation specialist Jackson Hewitt, says he likes to give new hires responsibility as quickly as possible. Before he does, however, Heimbouch makes sure his employees understand how Jackson Hewitt makes its money. "They learn how to use the products and services that we offer," he notes, "and they spend time in the tax department during our busy season."
It's a smart move. HR consultants say new employees need a clear picture of what their new employer does. It also helps if they grasp what impact their decisions and performance will have on the company's business, says Jonas Akerman, CEO of consulting firm BTS USA. "Once they understand how they fit in," Akerman explains, "they align better with the company's goals."
- Readers' Comments
Comment on this article...
Related Articles
- An ESOP to the Workers
April 13, 2007
- Phased Retirement Helps Retain Expertise
March 27, 2007
- Good Employees Don't Grow on Trees
March 12, 2007
- Manpower's Michael Van Handel
March 01, 2007
- Seeking Finance Talent in MBA Programs
March 01, 2007
Inside the May 2007 Issue
Cover Story
- Short-term Results, Long-term Goals
Features
- Offshoring Benefits Too Good to Pass Up
- CFOs Wield Influence with CEOs, Boards
- Merrill Lynch's Jeffrey Edwards
Special Reports
- 401(k)-IRA Rollovers: Think Twice
Also Inside
- From the Editor, May 2007
- Letters, May 2007
- Topline, May 2007
- Finance vs. Marketing
- View from Asia: Booms and Busts
- Benefits of Multifunction Print Devices
- Enormous Upside for Speculative Bubbles?
- Divining Oracle's Latest Gambit
- Long-term-care Insurance
- CFOs Paying More Attention to New Hires
- Grapevine, May 2007
We Deliver
advertisement
advertisement

Video
