You are here: Home : CFO Magazine : September 2006 Issue : Article
Numbers Crunch
Think reporting has changed since Enron? Just wait.
Ronald Fink
CFO Magazine
September 1, 2006
Five years after Enron, corporate financial reporting stands at a crossroads.
One route leads deep into the lightly charted terrain of "principles-based" reporting, where thousands of rules and regulations would be replaced by a relative handful of guiding precepts. The norm in Europe, this would be terra incognita of the most profound sort for American companies. Proponents argue that the unceasing torrent of new standards and regulations is creating an unworkable system. Foes counter that if the existing rules failed to prevent corruption and provide transparency, a system based on vague pronouncements is doomed to fail.
advertisementThe alternative path entails a continuing series of changes to the status quo that would undoubtedly increase complexity even as they attempt to improve transparency and accountability. No issue underscores these concerns more dramatically than fair-value accounting, in which assets and liabilities are marked to market rather than recorded at historical cost. The degree to which fair-value accounting is embraced (or not) will have a major impact on the very nature of corporate finance.
In short, Sarbanes-Oxley was just a warm-up for what lies ahead. In this special report, we examine the issues raised by principles-based accounting and disclosure, fair-value measurement, and improved financial transparency. We also include a poll of CFOs who have much to say about these issues. And, perhaps, much to learn.
For more on The Future of Reporting, click on any of the stories below:
•Standing on Principles
In a world with more regulation than ever, can the accounting rulebook be thrown away?
•Progress Report
A CFO survey finds finance executives surprisingly amenable to further reform of the financial reporting system.
•Will Fair Value Fly?
Fair-value accounting could change the very basis of corporate finance.
•The Case for Clarity
You know about the cost of Sarbox. What about the benefits?
•Days in Court
Would principles-based accounting result in fewer lawsuits, or make them blossom?
•Will You Still Matter?
Financial reports, says FASB, are not about measuring management.
- Readers' Comments
- Symphony of Greed
Posted by Ajith Sankar | September 29, 2006 09:31am
Related Articles
- Throwing Out the Accounting Rulebook?
September 01, 2006
- 2006 Financial Reporting Survey
September 01, 2006
- Measuring the Benefits of Sarbox
September 01, 2006
- Will You Still Matter?
September 01, 2006
- Will Fair Value Fly?
September 01, 2006
Inside the September 2006 Issue
Cover Story
- Numbers Crunch
Features
- Throwing Out the Accounting Rulebook?
- 2006 Financial Reporting Survey
- Will Fair Value Fly?
- Measuring the Benefits of Sarbox
Also Inside
- From the Editor, September 2006
- The Real Economies of Electric
- Topline, September 2006
- Why Buybacks May Fuel M&A
- Avoiding Common Financial Biases
- TV Ads Follow Shoppers to the Store
- Three's a Crowd
- Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty
- America's Crumbling Transport System
- The 2006 Working Capital Survey
- Sowing the Seeds of Your Legacy
- Private Equity: Seeking CFOs
- Grapevine, September 2006
We Deliver
advertisement
advertisement

Video
