Free Subscription to CFO Magazine

Today in Finance for July 10, 2006

You are here: Home : Today in Finance : Article

Feds Back Sarbox Whistle-blower

David Welch, former CFO turned Sarbox whistle-blower, now has the "flag and seal of the United States" on his side in his battle with Cardinal Bankshares, his attorney says.

July 7, 2006

Late Thursday, the Department of Labor filed a motion to intervene in what is reportedly the first Sarbanes-Oxley whistle-blower case to go to trial. The motion, along with a 13-page memorandum in support of former Cardinal Bankshares CFO David Welch's application for reinstatement, was released by the DoL, the federal agency that investigates and has jurisdiction over whistle-blower cases.

Welch claims he was fired in retaliation for disclosing accounting problems at Virginia-based Cardinal. He now has the "flag and seal of the United States" on his side, noted his attorney Bruce Shine in response to the DoL filing.

Welch, a corporate-finance veteran, has not held a permanent job since being fired from Cardinal in October 2002. In his suit, he is requesting to be reinstated and awarded back pay.

Last week, Cardinal refused a DoL judge's recommended order to reinstate the former CFO. Cardinal's outside counsel, Laura Effel, argued that the original "recommendation" by Judge Purcell to reinstate Welch was not a final order as defined by the department, and therefore, the bank would wait and see whether the DoL or Welch brings an action against the company in U.S. District Court.

Now the bank faces both prospects. Earlier on Thursday, Welch filed a complaint in U.S. District Court in Roanoke, Virginia, to force Cardinal to comply with the judge's order of reinstatement.


Reader CommentsDisplaying 2 of 2

  • GARY CADEMARTORI

    Jul 7, 2006 4:56 PM ET

    Let it Go to Trial....

    The bank so far has said the claim is bogus and as I have follwed this case, virtually no evidence besides the CFO's … more

  • David Newman

    Jul 7, 2006 1:33 PM ET

    Reinstate CFO

    The employee should be re-instated if his whistle blowing was the cause of detecting underlying accounting malfeseance … more

Post a comment | View all comments

advertisement

Related White Papers

» More Related White Papers

Business Solutions Center

» More Business Solutions Center Links

advertisement

We Deliver

Newsletters

Webcasts

Enter your email address to begin receiving updates on these topics.