Free Subscription to CFO Magazine

Today in Finance for April 11, 2006

You are here: Home : Today in Finance : Article

Skilling Bats Away More Allegations

Former Enron executive denies lying to analysts, maintains that the company didn't control the notorious LJM partnerships, and says he never asked subordinates to commit crimes so the company could make earnings.

April 11, 2006

Examine our Enron archive

On his second day on the witness stand, former Enron chief executive officer Jeffrey Skilling refuted several key allegations of prosecutors, who have charged him with 28 criminal counts of fraud and conspiracy.

Under questioning by his lawyer Daniel Petrocelli, Skilling denied that he misled analysts during conference calls, reported the Houston Chronicle. According to the newspaper, he further denied instructing others to hide information or to make untrue statements; he even stated that other Enron participants on the calls would occasionally correct him. In earlier testimony, noted the Chronicle, former head of investor relations Mark Koenig told jurors that others feared correcting Skilling on the calls and typically did not do so.

Skilling also reportedly contradicted the prior testimony of former chief financial officer Andrew Fastow regarding the notorious LJM partnerships, which prosecutors allege helped Enron move underperforming assets off its books. According to the Chronicle, Skilling told jurors that neither he nor Enron controlled the LJM partnerships — in fact, that Enron didn't have the ability to control those partnerships — and that he certainly didn't go along with LJM as "a surrogate" or "a puppet" of Enron.

Skilling also told jurors that he never asked subordinates to commit crimes so the company could make its earnings targets, according to Bloomberg.

"Did you ever have a single conversation with someone at Enron in which you said, 'We're not cutting it, we've got to break the law?' '' Petrocelli asked, according to the wire service.

Skilling reportedly replied: "I never did that. I don't think I did anything remotely like that."

Asked by Petrocelli, "Were you consumed by greed?", Skilling reportedly responded, "I was consumed by this company. I wanted to build this company into an institution." According to Bloomberg, he later added: "Money was secondary. It was the company that made a difference to me. I made more money than I ever expected, and that was plenty."


Reader CommentsDisplaying 2 of 2

  • J Whisman

    Apr 12, 2006 7:35 AM ET

    The Ring Master...

    This is a text book example of Implied Consent. John@CPASearchGroup.com

  • Eugene Adams

    Apr 11, 2006 4:03 PM ET

    To short

    I would like more info on the actual testimony.

Post a comment | View all comments

advertisement

Related White Papers

» More Related White Papers

Business Solutions Center

» More Business Solutions Center Links

advertisement

We Deliver

Newsletters

Webcasts

Enter your email address to begin receiving updates on these topics.