Free Subscription to CFO Magazine

Today in Finance for April 11, 2006

You are here: Home : Today in Finance : Article

IRS Eyeing Executive Pay

(continued)

Spousal and dependent travel expenses. Bring the kids to the Orlando conference, but don't expect the company to catch a break. Regulation 274, the rule that cites club membership provisions of the tax code, also deals with travel expenses. The provision stipulates that family travel expenses are only deductible in certain circumstances. For example, if the husband and kids of the executive are employees of the company; if they are traveling for a bona fide business purpose; or if they pay their own way, and the outlay is an otherwise deductible expense. Short of those unusual situations, however, the travel expenses should be characterized as compensation paid to the executive.

Transfer of property. Even something as seemingly insignificant as a company-issued mobile phone can be considered part of an executive's gross pay if ownership is transferred to the employee. The same goes for other items, such as laptop computers or partial ownerships of apartments or other real estate. They're all considered general forms of compensation unless the company is strict about making the sure an item is "signed in and out," when the executive begins and finishes using the property, says Rogers. Ownership, including maintenance of the item, should be the company's responsibility and therefore a write-off.

Wealth management. As part of many executive employment agreements, or sometimes separate or oral pacts, executives are provided with services, or a sum of money to purchase services, from investment and accounting firms used by the company. Generally, the perquisite is viewed as a taxable benefit because it is given in lieu of compensation, although there are some exceptions listed in Section 132 of the tax code, including wealth management offerings that qualify as a company-wide discount. Says Rogers: A wise executive would welcome the taxable benefit because paying tax on the service is a far less out-of-pocket cost than paying for the service itself.


Reader CommentsDisplaying 3 of 3

  • J Whisman

    Apr 11, 2006 11:56 AM ET

    CPA Search Group

    I.R.S. S.O.S..

  • Fred Whittlesey

    Apr 11, 2006 12:34 AM ET

    Correction to previous comment

    The executive would have taxable income on the date of vesting of the option, under 409A, not at the time of grant. … more

  • Allison Garrett

    Apr 10, 2006 1:20 PM ET

    Option Pricing

    The IRS has also been scrutinizing companies' processes for issuance of stock options to executives. The primary … more

Post a comment | View all comments

advertisement

Related White Papers

» More Related White Papers

Business Solutions Center

» More Business Solutions Center Links

advertisement

We Deliver

Newsletters

Webcasts

Enter your email address to begin receiving updates on these topics.