In general, choosing between a large and a small firm may depend on the project. Big firms are typically good at enterprisewide, global projects and carry much less risk, notes Dan Morris, co-founder of Verasage, a think tank focused on trends in professional services, "but if you want true innovation, you're much better off with a boutique or even a solo practitioner." — A.S.
Cheaper Advice
(continued)
LinkedIn Company Connections:
- IBM |
- Tata Consultancy Services |
- ModusLink Global Solutions |
- KPMG |
- American Electric Power |
- Compellant |
- Sentinal Group |
- Zeemote |
- High Street Partners |
- Equaterra |
- Grant Thornton |
Most Popular
advertisement
Inside the June 2009 Issue
Cover Story
- Fray on Pay
Features
- Cleaner (Balance) Sheets
- Cheaper Advice
Also Inside
- Comp & Circumstance
- EMRs: Not the Healthiest Choice?
- Prescription for Progress?
- Crackdown Alert
- Hot or Not?
- Going Green Now
- Structural Improvements
- Live and Learn
- Tripped Up
- Disciplinarians' Dilemma
- Green Counters
- Oracle Strikes Again
- "I Should Have Said No."
- Think Small
- Name That Chart
advertisement
Reader CommentsDisplaying 1 of 1
joe cortelli
Jun 23, 2009 9:36 AM ET
Boutique Consultants
Its interesting that this article closes w/ an assessment of a small firm in comparison to a large one. Since my firm … more
Post a comment | View all comments