Free Subscription to CFO Magazine

Director's Cut

Is a downturn a good time for CFOs to consider non-executive directorships?

December 8, 2008

For Ken Hanna, one is the magic number. According to the outgoing CFO of UK-based confectionery group Cadbury, gone are the days when finance chiefs would entertain thoughts of having a portfolio of half a dozen or so non-executive director (NED) roles. "More than one is too much in today's environment," Hanna asserts.

But as the economic downturn continues, CFOs are sure to appear more attractive than ever to companies seeking NEDs with financial savvy. While flattering to be so popular, governance experts advise CFOs to be careful. While they vary from company to company, and from country to country, these directorships are time-consuming and can affect a CFO's performance back at their full-time jobs. And "it's not as if the [CFO] day job is getting any easier," says Anne Simpson, executive director of the International Corporate Governance Network, a London-based not-for-profit organisation.

Meanwhile, the supply of qualified NEDs is shrinking dramatically. "What used to be an easy proposition has reversed itself," says Florian Schilling, a Frankfurt-based managing partner of Board Consultants. "In the past, if I approached ten CEOs or CFOs with a non-exec offer from a good company, eight or nine would have been interested. Today I can approach ten CEOs or CFOs with the same offer and at least nine would say they aren't available." But while many recruiters believe executives are shunning NED offers due to a concern over the risk of liability, Schilling believes the reason has more to do with an executive's own company putting its foot down. "CFOs are under pressure from their own boards to spend time on their companies," he notes.

This pressure is frowned upon by many veteran finance executives. "That's a short-sighted attitude," says Jan du Plessis, a former CFO who currently holds a portfolio of NEDs, including the non-executive chairmanship of tobacco group BAT. "That's seeing the CFO from a too narrow perspective." Du Plessis — now also a NED at Lloyds TSB, Rio Tinto and Marks & Spencer — had been the finance chief of Swiss luxury-goods firm Richemont for several years before taking up his first non-executive directorship in 1999, and recommends that CFOs hold at least one directorship in order to "broaden their horizons."

The Professionals
Hanna falls into du Plessis' camp, having already experienced juggling a full-time CFO job and an NED. While finance chief of the £5 billion (€6 billion) firm over the past five years, he's also been a non-exec at Inchcape, a £3.3 billion UK-based car retailer. While serving at various times on Inchcape's remuneration, nomination and audit committees, he admits that being an NED in addition to CFO of a FTSE 100 company meant forgoing the few free evenings and weekends he had enjoyed.

Yet there are big benefits, for both the executive and the company, when a CFO becomes an NED. Hanna, for example, reckons Inchcape benefits from his years of experience and his grip on "all the big, non-operational things that are on boards' agendas." As for his own development, he's grateful for the "breadth of experience" it has provided, allowing him to "learn and share that experience" with colleagues back at Cadbury. It's also opened doors. In November, Hanna announced his resignation from Cadbury to take up the non-executive chairmanship of Inchcape next May. As he hangs up his hat as CFO, he expects to be able to accept a few more NEDs. "But the people in the old days who had seven or eight, that didn't make sense to me," he says.

As companies cast their nets for financial talent such as Hanna, what can CFOs expect from the NED offers coming their way? For one, the "process of professionalisation" means that boardrooms are not the old boys' networks they once were, says Schilling of Board Consultants. "Many continental European companies are still in the transition from the old-style, relationship-based boards to ones that are composed of a mix of industry, country and function expertise." As a result, expectations are being raised in terms of the value that individual board members contribute, he adds.

In return, directors are generally being better rewarded for their contributions, with average annual remuneration for European NEDs more than doubling over the past ten years, to €72,195 in 2007, according to the latest study by headhunters Heidrick & Struggles. (See "Takeaway" at the end of this article.) European boards meet, on average, around nine times a year, with committees gathering 13 times a year. But, of course, the number of meetings escalates if a company runs into trouble, as many will during turbulent times such as these. It's for this reason that Schilling and other consultants advise CFOs to vet NED offers as carefully as they would a full-time position.

That's often easier said than done. "Ideally, it would be good to meet with the chairman of the company several times, and with a few of the board members, or even attend one of the board meetings," says Schilling. "But that runs into practical difficulties — you'll be one of several candidates, and not everyone has the time."

Fortunately, however, a future NED doesn't have to rely on gut feeling alone. More boards are undergoing formal performance reviews, which can provide a "blueprint of [a board's] strengths and weaknesses," Schilling notes. The results of the review may be confidential and be shown only to the finalist, but it's worth candidates asking to see it. And even if the results can't be revealed, Schilling adds, "just the fact that a board has undertaken a review is in itself an indication of its strength. Weaker ones will only go through a questionnaire."


Reader Comments» Post a comment

advertisement

Related White Papers

» More Related White Papers

Business Solutions Center

» More Business Solutions Center Links

advertisement

We Deliver

Newsletters

Webcasts

Enter your email address to begin receiving updates on these topics.